Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: Martijn van Buul <martijnb@atlas.ipv6.stack.nl>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/25/2005 16:13:41
--OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2005.08.25 17:02:43 +0000, Martijn van Buul wrote:
| On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:43:09PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
| > On 2005.08.25 08:44:43 +0000, Martijn van Buul wrote:
| > | It occurred to me that Martijn van Buul wrote in gmane.os.netbsd.deve=
l.network:
| > | > I can offer a Cardbus ral for testing; machine is currently running
| > | > anyway, using iMil's earlier backport of the ral driver.
| > |=20
| > | And I know someone with a PCI ral card. I might be able to coax him i=
nto=20
| > | some testing, if required.
| >=20
| > Great, are you sure they work fine under -current ?
|=20
| I'll have to check. At least the cardbus one had some serious issues with=
-current
| a while ago (kernel panic in wep_encrypt, IIRC), which is why I backstepp=
ed to
| 3.0BETA.
Those issues are stoppers. We should not backport bugs. :)
-- Rui Paulo
--OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDDeAlZPqyxs9FH4QRAulgAJ4wNtbi9Dr38JrnMGPWrgcr/loFFgCfblrN
agv9lNyFzJny9nSp8UHGTzc=
=Jl5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J--