Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Martijn van Buul <martijnb@atlas.ipv6.stack.nl>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/25/2005 21:10:51
It occurred to me that Rui Paulo wrote in gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network:
> Those issues are stoppers. We should not backport bugs. :)
CMIIAW, but these bugs originate from the new net80211 framework. There
is this (u)ral driver that works just fine with the net80211 version
currently available in 3.0_BETA (and netbsd-2). I'm using it as we speak.
Why won't we use that one, then?
Martijn (Who tried to build a -current kernel tonight, but failed. I'll
try again tomorrow)