Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: Martijn van Buul <martijnb@atlas.ipv6.stack.nl>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/25/2005 23:34:35
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2005.08.25 21:10:51 +0000, Martijn van Buul wrote:
| It occurred to me that Rui Paulo wrote in gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network:
| > Those issues are stoppers. We should not backport bugs. :)
|=20
| CMIIAW,=20
"wtf, I don't know what CMIIAW means!" -- is this a standard acronym ?
| but these bugs originate from the new net80211 framework. There
| is this (u)ral driver that works just fine with the net80211 version
| currently available in 3.0_BETA (and netbsd-2). I'm using it as we speak.
Hmmm, I see your point.
-- Rui Paulo
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDDkd7ZPqyxs9FH4QRAs4rAKCAQpWwdi3yH1BLMKPsWWvbm1/ueQCeJBOv
W15xvQfOnEL0GMvMebbFuSw=
=hVMF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--