Subject: Re: alias addresses vs routing
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: mouss <usebsd@free.fr>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/21/2006 21:56:18
der Mouse a écrit :
> I'm seeing something peculiar-looking, and I'm wondering whether this
> is the bug it looks like to me, or a misunderstanding in my
> expectations somewhere, or what.
>
> On NetBSD/i386 3.0:
>
> # ifconfig ex0
> ex0: flags=8a63<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> address: 00:10:4b:63:01:94
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
> status: active
> inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe63:194%ex0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
> # ifconfig ex0 10.100.0.1/30
> # ifconfig ex0 10.100.0.100/24 alias
> # netstat -rn -f inet
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Interface
> 10.10.10/23 link#1 UC 2 0 - fxp0
> 10.10.10.10 00:02:b3:1a:9e:91 UHLc 0 4 - fxp0
> 10.10.10.20 08:00:20:1f:7c:95 UHLc 2 2094 - fxp0
> 10.100/30 link#3 UC 0 0 - ex0
> 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 33192 lo0
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 0 33192 lo0
> #
>
> Note in particular the lack of a route to 10.100/24 corresponding to
> the "alias" address. But if the /30 is a different one (but still
> within the /24), it all works as expected:
>
if you delete the first address (the /30), the route for /24
"reappears". may be a bug in netstat?