--oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:15:10PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> >> But what about more hybrid architectures where some routers are
> >> hosts for other ones...?
> > They make life messy and were specifically forbidden in IPv6.
>=20
> ...huh?
>=20
> It sure doesn't seem to be *effectively* forbidden.  My house gateway,
> for example, has two v6 addresses, one on either side, and it works
> just fine when treated as a host at either of them.
>=20
> Or am I misunderstanding, and this applies only when at least one of
> the addresses is autoconfigured?  (I actually can't see how that would
> fail either, provided something gets routes set up right.)

Configuration.

If you're a router, you're supposed to use static address configuration.

Take care,

Bill

--oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEWODZWz+3JHUci9cRAi5JAJ9AboYBOniXIDM67cwsuVj3sqwilQCfbN/9
45t29KzXDbON6CzO6PFY2nQ=
=QtMp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp--