This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig33F069EE8F1C25FAAB08A1C6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rui Paulo wrote:
> At Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:38:56 +0000,
> Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
>>Rui Paulo wrote:
>>>I reacted the same way Pavel did, but since I don't suspect ipfilter
>>>is going to use this the name is fine.
>>Would you apply the same reasoning to PF_UNSPEC & friends? ;)
> I don't understand what you are trying to say.
> We are talking about packet tags, not protocol families.
> 
> Did I missunderstand you?

They have the prefix 'PF_' as well, and the prefix PF_ is used elsewhere 
as well (sys/exec_elf.h). So it's not like PF_ is reserved for pf(4) 
specific data...

Cheers,
-- 
         Thomas E. Spanjaard
         tgen@netphreax.net

--------------enig33F069EE8F1C25FAAB08A1C6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEsn/W6xCMwBJ+1+sRA0wzAJ9C3ms06dUBa1+xGVZppnCGFeUEdgCgjuwb
bQd9uEQ2Hvcc8X1SldX9vJ8=
=6Dix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig33F069EE8F1C25FAAB08A1C6--