Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?

To: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld%grumpf.hope-2000.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert%feyrer.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:25:53 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:

Could you use IPsec in transport mode and use a gif tunnel over that?
IIRC I read somewhere that this is functionally the same as IPsec tunnel
mode, and it would allow you to use NAT on the gif interface.


I've ventured in this direction, with gre instead of gif.
See my other mail for the results...


 - Hubert

References:
- reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?
  - From: Hubert Feyrer
- Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?
  - From: Hans Rosenfeld

Prev by Date: Interactions of NAT, gre(4) and IPsec [was: Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?]
Next by Date: Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?
Previous by Thread: Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?
Next by Thread: Re: reverse processing order: NAT, IPsec ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index