Re: accept_filter, accf_http, setsockopt and the EINVAL error

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:07:04PM -0600, Sverre Froyen wrote:
> 
> FreeBSD's code is identical.  Despite that fact, I've attached a patch that 
> makes setsockopt silently ignore the second call.  Please note that I do not 
> allow replacing a filter with a different type, only adding the same type 
> twice.

If FreeBSD's code is identical, then Apache is broken, right?  Why shouldn't
we just patch Apache in pkgsrc and feed the fix back to its maintainers?

Thor