Re: [PATCH] Setting IPv6 route advertisement accepting interfaces

[Hiroki Sato <hrs%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

Tonnerre LOMBARD <tonnerre%bsdprojects.net@localhost> wrote
  in <20090712204952.GE6410%jules.pas-un-geek-en-tant-que-tel.ch@localhost>:

to> Salut,
to>
to> This is the first part of my series of patches concerning IPv6 route
to> advertisements. It simply moves the variable deciding whether or not
to> to accept IPv6 route advertisements on a specific interface to be
to> specific to that interface.
to>
to> A second patch is going to separate the setting of when to accept
to> a default route (which is why there are more bits left on the
to> autoconf integer. However, it would have been really cool had there
to> still been 2 bits of space left on if_flags.)
to>
to> Either way, here's it. If your mailer doesn't like PGP signed
to> attachments, go to
to> 
http://www.netbsd.org/~tonnerre/patches/src/2009/netinet6-rtadv-per-interface.patch
to> to find a copy of said patch.

 I don't think adding a new flag is reasonable because there is a
 per-interface flag to control accepting RA (ND6_IFF_ACCEPT_RTADV)
 already.

-- Hiroki

Attachment: pgpSMp4LaSdkX.pgp
Description: PGP signature