Re: [PATCH] IP_MINTTL (was: Re: IP_RECVTTL)

[matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Christos Zoulas<christos%astron.com@localhost> 
wrote:
> In article <m2ab33czli.wl%minskim%bawi.org@localhost>,
> Min Sik Kim  <minskim%bawi.org@localhost> wrote:
>>At Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:13:30 -0400,
>>matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>
>>> While trying to compile liboping on netbsd I ran into a lack of
>>> IP_RECVTTL and noticed that freebsd did have this and a few other
>>> things defined in in.h:
>>>
>>>     469 #define      IP_RECVTTL              65   /* bool; receive IP TTL 
>>> w/dgram */
>>>     470 #define      IP_MINTTL               66   /* minimum TTL for packet 
>>> or drop */
>>>     471 #define      IP_DONTFRAG             67   /* don't fragment packet 
>>> */
>>
>>The following is a patch to add IP_MINTTL.
>
> commit it.
>
> christos

How about the IP_RECVTTL flag?  Also, is it safe to define these
locally for pre-patched systems in a program, or does the rest of the
support code need to exist to be safe?