tech-net archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: maintainers/users of de(4), lmc(4) ?
> > > Users, well, I've got some de hardware, and at least one machine that's
> > > got one in routine use (used to be two, but the hardware broke in one,
> > > and what I grabbed to replace it wasn't a de).
> >
> > This is hardware that doesn't work with tlp?
>
> I would like to know, too, whether anybody who is using de(4) cannot use
> tlp(4), instead. If not, why not?
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cats/2003/02/08/msg000114.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cats/2005/06/04/msg000196.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cats/2005/06/07/msg000197.html
etc?
On the other hand, autonegothication of 21143-PC with SIA doesn't
work with tlp(4), though I have not tried it with de(4).
---
Izumi Tsutsui
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index