Re: [patch] bug fix & TCP networking performance improvements

[David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost>]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> 
> dyoung%pobox.com@localhost said:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:40:35PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> > > Btw, I think that it would be better to use microuptime(9)
> > > rather than microtime(9) for these interval things, to make
> > > it robust against time changes. Or getmicrouptime(9) to save
> > > some cycles - accuracy shouldn't be an issue.
> > Definitely.
> 
> Here is something which works.
> OK, the use of kvm in netstat sucks. But it sucks already that
> kvm is needed just to see whether a socket is still in TIME_WAIT,
> so it doesn't make it much worse.

Looks fine to me.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung%ojctech.com@localhost      Urbana, IL * (217) 344-0444 x24