Re: hardware timestamping of packets

[Alexander Nasonov <alnsn%yandex.ru@localhost>]

Vlad Balan wrote:
> ...
> The closest thing that comes to my mind is the timestamping of
> bpf-captured packets, but bpf does not return packets over a socket
> and does not really preserve mbufs after this step but uses a buffer
> to pass them further.

+1 for adding timestamps to bpf interface. I think both bpf and
socket-based interfaces are needed for different cases.

Alex