hey, On 5/22/2015 6:21 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Tyler Retzlaff <rtr%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:hi, just soliciting opinions for removal of NATM (sys/netnatm). it has been bitrotting away for what looks like years, never gets compiled (not even by ALL kernels) and given its condition I doubt it is used by anyone anywhere. is there a process to be followed for removing it? is there a reason to keep it around?No objection means ok to remove? :)
That's how I'm interpreting it. If you want to do it go ahead I got a little busy the last couple of weeks and haven't had a chance to looking in to what ATM drivers should go at the same time.
rtr