Re: RFC: m_tag pool cache

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:26:14PM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
> Of course, m_tag_get() is used by packet processing path, this overhead
> would have a certain influence on packet throughput and latency.
> So, I think m_tag should use a dedicated pool cache like mbuf to call
> pool_cache_get() directly.

Which tags are you actually seeing allocated? It would be better to
remove the tags in first place if they are hot enough...

Joerg