Re: tail loss probe

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: tail loss probe
From: Mihai Chelaru <chelaru%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:45:16 +0100

On 25/07/16 23:56, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <CADbiSKXXUZtJEaEPo-RN3USARHCKpj5jTt5L2G+94g_JgPvvXg%mail.gmail.com@localhost>,
> Mihai Chelaru  <chelaru%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running with this [
>> http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kefren/tcp_tlp.diff ] tail loss
>> probe patch for some days already without noticing any issue.
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
> 
> LGTM. The latest rfc-draft has been expired for 3 years. What's the current
> status for it?
> 
> christos
> 
> 

Personally, I don't think it will make it into an RFC by itself.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tail loss probe
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- tail loss probe
  - From: Mihai Chelaru
- Re: tail loss probe
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Apply psz/psref to ifaddr and in_ifaddr
Next by Date: Re: TCP timestamp starting value
Previous by Thread: Re: tail loss probe
Next by Thread: Re: tail loss probe
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index