Re: TCP timestamp starting value

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: TCP timestamp starting value
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:47:06 +0200

EF> -- why incorporate src into the hash?
JS> No leaking of the network topology of the server, it can have more than
JS> one address.
I don't get that. What information do you leak if the pseudo-random
timestamp starting value is INdependent of the source address?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- TCP timestamp starting value (wa: A strange TCP timestamp problem?)
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value (wa: A strange TCP timestamp problem?)
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: TCP timestamp starting value
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: TCP timestamp starting value
Next by Date: Re: TCP timestamp starting value
Previous by Thread: Re: TCP timestamp starting value
Next by Thread: Re: TCP timestamp starting value
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index