tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Howto use agr to aggregate VPN tunnels



This isn't going to help solve your problem, it's just for your info...

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, BERTRAND Joël wrote:

<snip>

agr1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
       capabilities=7ff80<TSO4,IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx>
	capabilities=7ff80<TCP4CSUM_Tx,UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx,TCP6CSUM_Rx>
       capabilities=7ff80<TCP6CSUM_Tx,UDP6CSUM_Rx,UDP6CSUM_Tx,TSO6>
       enabled=0
       agrport: wm1, flags=0x3<COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
       agrport: wm2, flags=0x3<COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
       address: 68:05:ca:02:b2:59
       inet 192.168.10.128 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255
       inet6 fe80::6a05:caff:fe02:b259%agr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
       inet6 2001:7a8:a8ed:10::128 prefixlen 64

and agr1 runs as expected.

When I compare agr0 and agr1, I note that agr0 doesn't indicate IPv4 and IPv6 capabilities. Why ? If I understand, agr0 has to indicate these capabilities to work as expected.

I assume that by "indicate IPv5 and IPv6 capabilities" you are referring to the varions hardware-offload flags listed above. These are totally optional, and if hardware (or, in your case pseudo-hardware tap!) does not provide these capabilities, they are provided in software. These flags are documented in a bit more detail in the ifconfig(8) man page (but you need to search for the flag names in lower-case!)




+------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:      |
| (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com   |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
+------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index