Re: carp and routing

To: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost>, Stephen Borrill <netbsd%precedence.co.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: carp and routing
From: Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 11:56:04 +0100

On 19/05/2017 10:12, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>>>> This is my guess how the regression was introduced:
>>>> (1) DAD for IPv4 and IN_IFF_DETACHED flag were introduced (pre -7)
> 
> Oops. This was wrong. DAD for IPv4 was implemented after branching -7.
> So Roy is perhaps not related to the issue.

It's good to know that I'm not related to carp :)

Roy

References:
- carp and routing
  - From: Stephen Borrill
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Stephen Borrill
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Stephen Borrill
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Stephen Borrill
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: carp and routing
  - From: Ryota Ozaki

Prev by Date: Re: carp and routing
Next by Date: status of bpf_mtap()/bpf_mtap_softint() ?
Previous by Thread: Re: carp and routing
Next by Thread: mpsafe-ing
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index