Re: npf: nbuf_ensure_contig and large options

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

max%m00nbsd.net@localhost (Maxime Villard) writes:

>NPF needs to be able to do an ensure_contig on secondary mbufs, without
>moving everything into the first one. Not sure how to achieve this, I will
>probably just file a PR.

I wouldn't be surprised if the TCP/IP code itself makes the same assumptions,
i.e. to expect all headers in the first mbuf.

-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."