Re: New class of receive error

[Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>]

Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost> wrote:
>With that in mind, I would not be too upset if a new option as suggested
>was added, which defaulted to off on UDP and unix domain sockets, but
>defaulted to on for the routing socket (and if we ever get it, its clone, the
>mobile-ip socket).

I haven't tried running any of the mobile-ip daemons since the change
to error reporting went in and haven't checked the source for any
impact.