Re: Time to retire some ancient network pseudo-interfaces?

[Tyler Retzlaff <rtr%crt0.ca@localhost>]

There was mild objection at the time in that the older drivers presented 
examples in the variations of hardware that gave us enlightenment in to 
how to provide network driver interfaces.

Last I recall someone was going to dig up hardware and test. Without 
positive agreement about the removal I didn't proceed with removal.

On 2018-09-05 09:30 AM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 05/09/2018 à 18:02, Jason Thorpe a écrit :
> > Yes, I think I mentioned that netnatm could / should be retired, as 
> > well as
> > the Midway ATM driver.
>
> I see that now, so let's do it. Someone objecting? It was already 
> discussed
> three years ago for the most part.
>
> Removing netnatm implies removing the 'midway' driver, if_atmsubr.c, and
> sys/netnatm/; all three are noted as obstacles in TODO.smpnet.