Re: RFC1948

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <BA072D60-FD62-4A3D-A4E0-EC536252AAB6%me.com@localhost>,
Jason Thorpe  <thorpej%me.com@localhost> wrote:
>RFC6528 is standards-track:
>
>	https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6528
>
>...so why this change instead?

This change just simplified the existing code, and restored the
default randomization behavior prior without the information leak.
I will look into implementing rfc6528.

Best,

christos