Subject: Re: Packages built from in-tree components
To: Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com>
From: Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/18/1998 13:45:49
On 18-Aug-98 Todd Vierling spoke unto us all:
# On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Tim Rightnour wrote:
#
# : The question here is.. is this the right thing to do for pkgs that are
# : basicly
# : modifications of in-tree code.
#
# Yes. Datestamp the tarball (distname-YYYYMMDD.tar.gz) and it can be put in
# ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}. Make sure the tarball is exact to the distribution,
# and make any diffs into pkg patches. Nuke CVS/RCS directories, if any.
Aww crap.. thats not what I did.. ;) I patched it.. fixed up the Imakefile and
all the inconsistencies, built a tarball of that.. and had a patchless package.
Should I redo it all? (his patches do not apply cleanly in the least)
# I have a ctm pkg that's been sitting idle for ages that would do the same
# ting.... ;)
I figured this would happen eventually..
---
Tim Rightnour - root@garbled.net
http://www.zynetwc.com/~garbled/garbled.html