On Sat, 1 May 1999, Todd Vierling wrote:

> Yah.  Actually, I'll probably end up making it an unconditional patch that
> is activated by a switch (that's the `standard pkgsrc way' of doing this
> type of thing).

I'll be interested to see how that works.

> However, I can probably say that it won't make it into the pkgsrc tarball
> destined for the 1.4 release

Understandable.

> (though it probably doesn't matter much, as the
> ssl-enabled version will not allow pkg binaries to be built ;)

I hadn't considered that. There aren't many binary packages for mac68k
anyhow, so I've never installed a single one. Is that a reason to
prefer the seperate *-ssl package over a switch?