Subject: Re: gimp depends on emacs?
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <tron@lyssa.owl.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/03/1999 22:46:17
In article <199905032218.HAA06595@dingo.ping.net.au>,
	Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf@ping.net.au> writes:
> Why not leave them out if they are redundant?

These files are *not* redundant. Only the copies in "pkgsrc" would be.

> I never missed them for the time I've been working with gimp. 

You are not the only "gimp" user.

	Regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                http://home.owl.de/~tron/