-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 3 May 1999, Matthias Scheler wrote:

>Supplying a replacement tool to generate these files would do the same
>without adding any redundant files. I was never NetBSD's method to go
>for the quick and dirty hack.

So including the files is redundant, but writing a tool to auto-generate
files whose contents are known in advance is not?  Defend that.

>So all you emacs haters stop complaining and start working.

What does loving or hating emacs have to do with whether I want a
package to have to depend on a much larger package to generate files
whose contents are known in advance?

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBNy51DokLDoBfn5jPAQGenwgAoERd+Qum+kKV5VCgn2OFd/R+WeDTfiva
WUHXrixXQE/R+X4jauZ4ZrmyCh9sQI2RwF1mqvkvszbEn6Ka3AOWnZGWkGZv/CNZ
vjkE+TmciFbU18MBuCSDNcyQ6nsk7clsmsNY3kmEWY3P8PbfnA0ZWjC332NwFXGu
tLWwFVsAzldiv66e0xCOKf6kfi+Cy3Sy83Bvfr3erk0kMBL0TyOz2y/urYQFpneT
j9v/rP4qnRs/d5PounSyoy6NCjsPJ8xDLrCxxQLT/THO9hzR+X4F0ONlbiW36r8u
UOLMkwJAAL4lM8iOfQ9DYNjNSicm9e6HYWgjKrf7QIRuYrJnMdoVWg==
=kZDj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----