Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de> writes:
> I don't know either... but what if we make a mix between b) and c) add a
> seperate ns-flash package, and let only the communicator package depend on
> it?

please, no.  navigator and communicator are already huge, don't burden
their installation with _even more_ bits.


> btw, "netscape" would come in handy as a meta-package, that installs
> everything (ns-flash, communicator, navigator).

Actually, this is kinda bogus.  if you have communicator, you don't
really need navigator.


cgd
-- 
Chris Demetriou - cgd@netbsd.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.