Right answer, different question.

	We're only concerned about between point releases
	1.4 -> 1.4.1 -> 1.4.2


		David/absolute

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, David Maxwell wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 01:08:40PM -0600, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> 
> > > If we don't want to force warnings about "lib minor version number >= X
> > > expected", then we have to keep full sets, as far as I can tell.
> Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > Were any lib minors incremented going from 1.4 to 1.4.2?
> 
> Between 1.4, and my Mid Jan -current...
> 
> libc.so.12.40		libc.so.12.54
> libcurses.so.2.2	libcurses.so.2.5
> libedit.so.2.2		libedit.so.2.3
> 			libmenu.so.0.1
> libpcap.so.0.0		libpcap.so.1.1
> libtelnet.so.1.0	libtelnet.so.2.0
> libtermcap.so.0.0	libtermcap.so.0.1
> libtermlib.so.0.0	libtermlib.so.0.1
> libutil.so.5.0		libutil.so.5.1
> libwrap.so.0.0		libwrap.so.0.2
> libz.so.0.1		libz.so.0.2
> 
> Notice libmenu and libtelnet in particular.
> 
> -- 
> David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net -->
> All this stuff in twice the space would only look half as bad!
> 					      - me
>