I'd rather avoid cluttering doc (but that can be solved by using a
	subdir).

	I'd need to change changes2html to read the last two files in the
	early part of the year (not a massive task), and we'd want to
	update any references we have to pkg-CHANGES.

	I would not have any objections (just thinking out loud)

		David/absolute

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Alistair G. Crooks wrote:

> > pkg-CHANGES is now 136K. What do people think about moving
> > the old entries (say everything before september 1999) into
> > pkg-CHANGES.prev?
> 
> I've no problems with doing that, but ...
> 
> Why September 1999? I would prefer to do it in years i.e.
> pkg-CHANGES.1997, pkg-CHANGES.1998, pkg-CHANGES.1999 and pkg-CHANGES-2000
> 
> Why the name "pkg-CHANGES.prev"? See above.
> 
> Regards,
> Alistair
>