On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> Nah, i'd vote for not keeping this kludge at all.
> What's with ghostscript v6 btw, which should implement this new split (gs,
> gsnoX)? :-)

I'd like to get this sorted out first :)
would be wrong to have gs5 installing gs and gsx11 and gs6, gs and gsnoX.
This would be hairy for packages depending on gs.

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--