Subject: Re: xpkgwedge should be NO_MTREE
To: Johnny C. Lam <lamj@stat.cmu.edu>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 07/13/2000 13:37:11 
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> I think xpkgwedge should have NO_MTREE defined since the whole point
> of the package is to install everything under ${LOCALBASE} and not
> have to touch ${X11BASE}.  Does this sound right to anyone else?

Yes.


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!