At 9:46 Uhr +0200 28.3.2001, Nick Hudson wrote:

>The fact that you've got two files matching libwrap.so.*.* is probably
>causing the problem. Any reasons you need to keep .0.0?

Not really. As I understand it, ld.so picks the library  with the highest
minor number available. Like in

[hauke@q700] /usr/lib > l libc.so*
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  394980 May 24  1997 libc.so.12.14
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  395566 Jan  1  1998 libc.so.12.20
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  404091 May 27  1998 libc.so.12.26
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  351675 Feb  4  1996 libc.so.12.3
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  404552 Sep  6  1998 libc.so.12.31
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  360187 Feb 13  1996 libc.so.12.4
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  469495 Sep 12  1999 libc.so.12.45
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  360559 May 29  1996 libc.so.12.5
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  486083 Nov 20  1999 libc.so.12.50
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  486474 Feb  3  2000 libc.so.12.55
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  563281 Nov 18 04:49 libc.so.12.62.1
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  360394 Nov  4  1996 libc.so.12.7
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  368779 Dec 31  1996 libc.so.12.8

...

Anyway, moving the old libwrap.so out of the way did the trick. Thanks.

>I'll try and make the configure script a little more robust.

That's probably a good idea.

	hauke

--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)