Subject: Re: emacs category?
To: None <mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu>
From: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/24/2001 14:04:14
On Thu, 24 May 2001 mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu wrote:
# On Thu, 24 May 2001, Greywolf wrote:
#
# > On Thu, 24 May 2001 mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu wrote:
# >
# > # Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
# > # From: mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu
# > # To: tech-pkg@netbsd.org
# > # Subject: emacs category?
# > #
# > #
# > # I was wondering if we should perhaps create an emacs category for various
# > # emacs packages? Or would the preference be to try and put them in the
# > # existing categories? For example, would a, for example, 'algol-mode'
# > # package go under "editors" (its for editing), "devel" (you only would use
# > # it for editing a program), "lang" (to keep it with algol),?
# >
# > editors/emacs-extras?
#
#
# so
#
# editors/emacs-foo-mode
# editors/emacs-bar-mode
# editors/emacs-baz-mode
No.
editors/emacs-extras. Period. Or editors/emacs-mod(ul)es.
--*greywolf;
--
*BSD: the Berkeley redemption.