Subject: Re: Locations of some packages baffles me
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/28/2001 18:39:18
[ On Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 12:17:46 (-0700), Greywolf wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Locations of some packages baffles me
>
> Take this as you will, but if it is an X thing, it should go into the X
> tree.  It's where I'd expect to find such things.  Historically -- and
> maybe I'm being a dinosaur, here -- this was the way it was laid out
> at most places I worked, and it made sense.  So I think I disagree with
> you on this point, but it's not a hard disagreement (minds are prone
> to change over time).

If that's your view then why bother with ${LOCALBASE} indeed!  There's
no point.  You're mixing add-on stuff with system (er, X11) stuff.

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>     <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>;   Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>