On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Tom Spindler wrote:

> > Btw, why the hell does fvwm2 now depends on gtk and imlib?
> >
> > It now takes a lot of time to just install X11 and build fvwm2.
> > It is enough that you need to build perl, for one of the dependencies
> > for fvwm2, which needs autoconf.
>
> It appears they were added by nra@netbsd.org - presumably for the
> FvwmGtk module. I could personally do without it.

I've updated xpmroot and I'm working on fvwm2 right now. Would this
be acceptable before we get fvwm2-gtk etc?

+.if defined(WANT_FVWM_GTK)
+PLIST_SUBST+=   GTK=""
+.include "../../x11/gtk/buildlink.mk"
+.else
+PLIST_SUBST+=   GTK="@comment "
+.endif
+
+.if defined(WANT_FVWM_IMLIB)
+PLIST_SUBST+=   IMLIB=""
+.include "../../graphics/imlib/buildlink.mk"
+.else
+PLIST_SUBST+=   IMLIB="@comment "
+.endif
+
 .include "../../audio/rplay/buildlink.mk"
 .include "../../devel/readline/buildlink.mk"
-.include "../../graphics/imlib/buildlink.mk"
-.include "../../x11/gtk/buildlink.mk"
 .include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"

I'm also one of those who just want a small footprint window manager
without any extra garbage...

Martti

---
Martti Kuparinen <martti.kuparinen@iki.fi>              NetBSD - No media hype
http://www.iki.fi/~kuparine/                            http://www.netbsd.org/