> > > I worked around this with patches that rename the 'setlock' program and its
> > > man page to 'setlock-sm' (and of course all references to 'setlock' in the
> > > source code).
> > 
> > This is not ideal either. Maybe serialmail should depend on qmail? It
> > wouldn't make many people unhappy I imagine. Alternatively setlock
> 
> Although I _think_, setlock from both packages is used for the same purpose
> and is probably based on the same sources (haven't checked that), I would
> like for every package to keep the programs that come with it. At least the
> man pages differ in what they say about the arguments.

I wanted to have a look at it, but no setlock in my qmail-1.03nb2. So it
seems there is no problem with serialmail after all.

Regards,
	-- Jachym _Freza_ Holecek