Subject: Re: lightweight groff package?
To: Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf@ping.net.au>
From: Julien T. Letessier <mezis@users.sourceforge.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/20/2003 12:40:16
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig7677E44D021350494E6F7C05
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> let me add a comment here...
>
> There are many packages overloaded with features that are deemed optional by
> the originating software authors/developers. In some cases, packages have
> been patched beyond recognition to suit the needs of the package maintainer.
>
> Why not add only those dependencies that are required to buld and run the
> package and leave optional dependencies to the user?
You mean, something à la gentoo linux. I second this, but the problem is
that adding "options" for packages requires more maintenance --
different PLISTs for different options, possible dependancies on a
package with particular options, etc.
Cheers,
--
Julien T. Letessier
Solarpack Project
http://solarpack.sourceforge.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail & vCards
/\ - against microsoft attachments
--------------enig7677E44D021350494E6F7C05
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj9DUBUACgkQD59VlPZXlnP+YwCeJNrYoPovFagDEugMVJptEXvY
2+UAnjYP/WOulXwP9v6sfirtLvoFKWIC
=HBa/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig7677E44D021350494E6F7C05--