Subject: Re: USE_TETEX2 (was: CVS commit: pkgsrc)
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 11/07/2003 19:32:35
--==========832F9DA9BF5ED425D0ED==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
> I see this could be useful, but it seems like it would be better if
> everything would default to tetex version 2 already. There has been some
> discussion about making tetex version 2 the default and even changing
> print/teTeX2-bin to be named print/teTeX-bin.
>
> (So maybe this should be called USE_TETEX1 instead of 2.)
AFAIK teTeX2 already includes dvipdfm 0.13.2c. So IMHO print/dvipdfm should =
rather conflict with teTeX2.
--=20
Marc Recht
--==========832F9DA9BF5ED425D0ED==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE/q+VD7YQCetAaG3MRAqdEAJ4xSeWw8zsL7i7qtjUjuYUfEYDfCQCfRuvx
cD7cu7iBMDtcsyh5gFpn5k0=
=JcF1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========832F9DA9BF5ED425D0ED==========--