Subject: Re: doc/CHANGES documenting every little PKGREVISION
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/03/2004 14:19:05 
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:54:31AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> It doesn't seem right that doc/CHANGES should document every PKGREVISION
> bump.

I think we should only mention non-automatic bumps, i.e. exclude
exactly this kind of notes where only a dependency was updated.

 Thomas