On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:54:31AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> It doesn't seem right that doc/CHANGES should document every PKGREVISION
> bump.
> 
> Since that file is used to generate a webpage, it seems like unuseful
> information for the CHANGES to list over 500 packages bumped because of
> tiff bump.
> 
> I do not plan on documenting all that to CHANGES, and only will note that
> tiff itself was upgraded.
> 
> Please let me know if that is okay.

Why do you think that you have to mention every bump to PKGREVISION
in pkgsrc/doc/CHANGES?

Regards,
Alistair
--
Alistair Crooks <agc@pkgsrc.org>