On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 01:09:59PM +1000, Rene Hexel wrote:
>   What I do mind is bumping PKGREVISION in a large number of
> packages to indicate that *another* package was updated!
> There are cases when we don't have a choice (i.e., if there
> is a library API/ABI change that requires new binaries for
> dependent packages), but this was apparently not the case
> here.

If the fix was critical for i386, I don't think I would
see you arguing here, would I?

 Thomas