On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:00:55 +0200
"Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv@menta.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:06:40 +0100
> Dick Davies <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> wrote:
> 
> > Personally I serve that directory over Apache, so to my mind it makes
> > sense. Ho hum.
> 
> What's the problem in serving the 'doc' directory by itself?  All browsers
> (any that doesn't?) are able to display text files perfectly.  And in some
> cases, they can also diplay pdf's (or whatever else) embedded in them
> (we don't have any package installing pdfs under doc, atm).  So this argument
                 ^^^

Well... I used an incorrect regexp to look for packages installing pdf's.
There actually are some of them.  But anyway, my point remains.  Most
browsers are able to display them, either embedded or opening an external
application.

Cheers

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/