Subject: Re: [change request] pattern for patch filenames
To: Roland Illig <roland.illig@gmx.de>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/29/2004 09:28:04
--O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 06:01:51PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I would like the pattern for patch filenames to be changed. In general=20
> it is the shell pattern "patch-*", but there are two occurrences of the=
=20
> AWK pattern "patch-[A-Za-z0-9]+". I would like to have the underscore=20
> ("_") included in the allowed letters.
>=20
> With this change we could name the patch files after the files they=20
> patch ("patch-src_inode_c"), not with some arbitrarily chosen number=20
> ("patch-af").
I actually find encoding the target filename in the patch filename a
bit superfluous -- it's already at the top of the patch file.
I would support naming patches after their purpose/function which is
much more useful:
patches/patch-statvfs_1
patches/patch-statvfs_2 (if there are multiple files that need patching..)
imho, of course.
g.
--O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFA4KmDluYOb9yiFXoRAsNUAJ4jG3Bms1ozfcChDDGPxgBHr9wvFgCbBAWW
wPWz6sdAvkN/dYN8QifVF5E=
=8rWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj--