Subject: Re: shared objects installed without execute permission bogus warning?
To: Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.nopcode.org>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/28/2004 10:50:46
--wfgmFf0LjPE7xkRl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:45:34AM +0200, Juan RP wrote:
> > [*] Which makes me wonder what the big deal is. It's just a few lines =
of
> > text in the build output; what is the problem? Would putting the c=
ode
> > in question under PKG_DEVELOPER=3DYES make it more palatable?
>=20
> Yes, because if the application/library works without exec permissions, w=
ho
> cares about this? you're right and this should be fixed, but the end user
> does not need to fix them.
>=20
> Adding the checks only when PKG_DEVELOPER=3DYES is the way to go IMHO.
and/or ${OPSYS} =3D=3D "Interix", hence the _OPSYS_SHLIB_EXEC suggestion.
g.
--wfgmFf0LjPE7xkRl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFBgEJlluYOb9yiFXoRAgUZAJ93ZV3O1HYYJtJrn7Ix1xmzHAeLmwCgrHrr
5SfkWo7K25+3JznzOTuQsg4=
=FTrP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--wfgmFf0LjPE7xkRl--