Subject: Re: format of status messages
To: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
From: Roland Illig <roland.illig@gmx.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/27/2005 22:06:43
Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:20:27PM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
>
>>Perhaps we can have the following in bsd.pkg.mk (and use it):
>>
>>STAGE_INDICATOR= ===>
>>STEP_INDICATOR= ==>
>>SUBSTEP_INDICATOR= =>
>
>
> i am not opposed to make it more clear where the messages belong, but
> isn't the hierarchy logic you propose a bit backwards? -- "the shorter
> arrow you get, the deeper you are". also, it doesn't scale well, what
> if you add something at the end of the chain?
I thought for the first step it would be wise to emulate the current
behaviour before inventing something new. I think for many cases the
three variables are enough. At least until now noone has complained. ;)
After thinking a bit about it, I prefer the following solution about the
one above:
STAGE_MSG= ${ECHO} "===>"
STEP_MSG= ${ECHO} "==>"
SUBSTEP_MSG= ${ECHO} "=>"
I would like to have these variables public (that is: not beginning with
an underscore) so that package authors may use them.
Roland