On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> Then how should we handle this?
>
> - Make openmotif a "conditional" dependency (as often done in FreeBSD's
>  ports) ?  Use it if it's already there, don't use it if not.
>
> - Modify the package so that it doesn't require openmotif at all?  The
>  resulting xdvi is different then, and some may prefer the openmotif
>  version.
>
> - Tear xdvi out and make it a package on its own?  (so that teTeX can be
>  without openmotif)

I'd go for the middle approach here for now.
The third one means even more maintenance effort.
The first approach (if somefile exists .include ...) would be ok with me 
too.


  - Hubert

-- 
Genervt von Viren und von Viren versandten Spam-Mails?  -> www.NetBSD.de
Fed up from viruses & virus-originated spam mail?       -> www.NetBSD.org