On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> >Hm, I disagree.  Since OO2 is still in RC stage, and a source package is
> >not quite near yet, OO1 will probably still be around for a while, and I
> >would prefer to make the two completely parallel.  This is as easy as
> >renaming the five OO2 binaries to soffice2 and so on:
> 
> IF they can be made parallel, that's fine. Right now, they conflict.
> So either way of fixing is fine for me, but the current situation is 
> buggy.

Hm, it's not as easy as I initially thought, with this network of symlinked
scripts calling each other, looking at their $0 and so on.  It would end up
with files under ${PREFIX}/openoffice.org2.0/ being renamed, too, and then
it's probably not worth the trouble anymore.  Any thoughts?  

	Geert