On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:45:40PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> For the tag should form the basic to remove broken packages by threating
> people accordingly. Broken packages is somewhat wishy-washy, some rules
> should be defined. A good suggestion for me includes:
> - breaks in bulk builds of both DragonFly and two NetBSD releases
> - has no special reason for the breakage (see above for examples :-))
> - breaks for obvious stupidness (hi p5-math-pari!)
> Packages which fail the first point are often a good candidate for
> simple fixes or platform masks, but not always.

Sounds fine with me.
I don't really feel like tracking these down, I thought that
schmonz would do it since he came up with the idea, but after
the first one or two he punted :|
 Thomas