Subject: Re: Consulting MAINTAINER before updating a package
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Roland Illig <rillig@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/19/2007 01:11:11
Greg Troxel wrote:
> "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>>MAINTAINERSTYLE=strong
>>
>>Why does this need to be a *variable*? Will it be of any use,
>>anywhere in the pkgsrc infrastructure? If not it should be a comment
>>as Johnny (IIRC) mentioned.
>
>
> I don't know; probably not. (How is MAINTAINER used? If displayed on a
> web page, this is almost as useful.) My thought is that if we are going
> to agree on semantics and a have a limited set of codepoints, then the
> information should be expressed in machine-parseable form to reduce
> confusion and unneeded variability. A variable lets pkglint detect
> values not in the enum, but I suppose slows down make. A commented
> variable assignment seems fine in order to get the rigid semantics
> without the
>
> # MAINTAINERSTYLE=strong
pkglint can not only check variable assignments, it also knows about
comments and much other stuff, so this is a lame excuse. :)
Just tell me what pkglint should check or add the code yourself. By the
way, all my maintained packages have MAINTAINERSTYLE=weak.
Roland